RETHINKING ASSESSMENT: ALTERNATIVE EVALUATION METHODS IN HIGHER EDUCATION

  • Unique Paper ID: 168546
  • Volume: 5
  • Issue: 7
  • PageNo: 401-408
  • Abstract:
  • This essay explores the need to rethink assessment practices in higher education, challenging the reliance on traditional methods such as standardized testing, examinations, and quizzes. While these conventional approaches have been integral in measuring student performance, they often emphasize rote memorization and timed recall, potentially undermining deeper learning and genuine engagement with the subject matter. Critics highlight the limitations of such assessments in providing a comprehensive picture of student understanding and practical skills, leading to a shallow learning experience focused on short-term grades. This study advocates for alternative evaluation methods—including portfolio assessments, peer evaluations, and project-based learning—that promote profound learning, collaboration, and real-world relevance. By examining these innovative approaches, the essay aims to demonstrate how they can enhance student motivation, critical thinking, and skill acquisition, thus better preparing students for the complexities of modern life and the workforce. Ultimately, the paper seeks to equip educators, administrators, and policymakers with insights to transform assessment from a mere grading tool into a catalyst for growth and development, fostering a richer educational experience for diverse learning styles.

Cite This Article

  • ISSN: 2349-6002
  • Volume: 5
  • Issue: 7
  • PageNo: 401-408

RETHINKING ASSESSMENT: ALTERNATIVE EVALUATION METHODS IN HIGHER EDUCATION

Related Articles