Author Login IJIRT Partner Network (IPN) Login

a comparison between large bite vs small bite for midline abdominal wound closure

  • Unique Paper ID: 154699
  • Volume: 8
  • Issue: 12
  • PageNo: 209-213
  • Abstract:
  • Midline incisions has advantage of rapid and wide access to the abdominal cavity with minimal damage to muscles, nerves, and the vascular supply of the abdominal wall, hence causing minimal long-term morbidity.1 However, wound complications after any laparotomy increases burden on resources of the health care system. 2 Wound complications after laparotomy include surgical site infection, stitch abscess, incisional hernia, wound dehiscence, evisceration.1 Wound infection and wound dehiscence after laparotomy are likely to be followed by incisional hernia within months or perhaps a few years.
Download article email to a friend

Cite This Article

  • ISSN: 2349-6002
  • Volume: 8
  • Issue: 12
  • PageNo: 209-213

a comparison between large bite vs small bite for midline abdominal wound closure

Related Articles

Impact Factor
8.01 (Year 2024)
UGC Approved
Journal no 47859

Join Our IPN

IJIRT Partner Network

Submit your research paper and those of your network (friends, colleagues, or peers) through your IPN account, and receive 800 INR for each paper that gets published.

Join Now

Latest Publication

Archive

View More

Recent Conferences

NCSEM 2024

National Conference on Sustainable Engineering and Management - 2024 Last Date: 15th March 2024

Submit inquiry