UGC PhD Minimum Standards and Procedures Regulations: A Comparative Analysis on Improving Quality Standards, Academia Concerns, Scope and Gap Analysis, Limitations, and Suggestive Reforms and Measures in Terms of International Standards

  • Unique Paper ID: 173007
  • Volume: 11
  • Issue: 9
  • PageNo: 1560-1576
  • Abstract:
  • The quality of doctoral research has been a subject of intense debate in academic circles, particularly in relation to the standards and procedures set by regulatory bodies. In India, the University Grants Commission (UGC) has been at the forefront in establishing minimum standards and procedures for PhD programs through the UGC PhD Minimum Standards and Procedures Regulations. However, there has been growing concern regarding their effectiveness in enhancing the quality of research output, particularly when compared to international standards. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive comparative analysis of the UGC regulations vis-à-vis global best practices. It explores the issues faced by Indian academia in adhering to these standards, assesses the gaps between national and international norms, identifies the limitations of the current UGC framework, and proposes reforms to improve the quality of doctoral education in India.

Copyright & License

Copyright © 2025 Authors retain the copyright of this article. This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

BibTeX

@article{173007,
        author = {Dr Satish Gaikwad},
        title = {UGC PhD Minimum Standards and Procedures Regulations: A Comparative Analysis on Improving Quality Standards, Academia Concerns, Scope and Gap Analysis, Limitations, and Suggestive Reforms and Measures in Terms of International Standards},
        journal = {International Journal of Innovative Research in Technology},
        year = {2025},
        volume = {11},
        number = {9},
        pages = {1560-1576},
        issn = {2349-6002},
        url = {https://ijirt.org/article?manuscript=173007},
        abstract = {The quality of doctoral research has been a subject of intense debate in academic circles, particularly in relation to the standards and procedures set by regulatory bodies. In India, the University Grants Commission (UGC) has been at the forefront in establishing minimum standards and procedures for PhD programs through the UGC PhD Minimum Standards and Procedures Regulations. However, there has been growing concern regarding their effectiveness in enhancing the quality of research output, particularly when compared to international standards. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive comparative analysis of the UGC regulations vis-à-vis global best practices. It explores the issues faced by Indian academia in adhering to these standards, assesses the gaps between national and international norms, identifies the limitations of the current UGC framework, and proposes reforms to improve the quality of doctoral education in India.},
        keywords = {},
        month = {February},
        }

Related Articles