Copyright © 2026 Authors retain the copyright of this article. This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

@article{172424,
        author = {JAGADEESH S A and DR. MURALIDHAR S},
        title = {“A Study on Quality of Work Life and Organizational Effectiveness, with specific reference to College Teachers working in Bangalore University”},
        journal = {International Journal of Innovative Research in Technology},
        year = {2025},
        volume = {11},
        number = {8},
        pages = {3107-3113},
        issn = {2349-6002},
        url = {https://ijirt.org/article?manuscript=172424},
        abstract = {Quality of Work Life (QWL) is being defined as “The Quality of the relationship between the man and task at workplace”. QWL has gained prominence in the Organizational Behaviour as an indicator of the overall of human experience in the work place. QWL refers to the relationship between a worker and his environment, adding the human dimension to the technical and economic dimensions within which the work is normally viewed and designed. QWL focus on the problem of creating a human working environment where employees work co – operatively and achieve results collectively. QWL refers to the level of satisfaction, motivation, involvement and commitment individuals experience with respect to their line at work. QWL is the degree of excellence brought about work and working conditions which contribute to the overall satisfaction and performance primarily at the individual level but finally at the organizational level. 
The perceptions on the instructive capability demonstrate that among the aggregate respondents 67% (334) are having PG with M.Phil. It can be comprehended that the greater part of the employees has the base capability required for instructing in higher instructive organizations, notwithstanding they are required to update their capability with Ph.D. or SLET/NET. The appropriateness means scores on Quality of Work Life Measurements general mean score extended from 3.393 to 4.042 and the measurement Social Significance and Work-Life secured higher mean score and remained at the top though the measurement Sufficient and Reasonable Pay secured the slightest score and remained finally. Of the eight measurements given the respondents are of the sentiment that Social Importance and Work Life has the most astounding effect, second is looked for the Open doors for Development and Security, and the slightest choice is opined for Work and Aggregate Life Space.},
        keywords = {Quality of Work Life, Work Life Balance, Organizational Effectiveness, Employee Performance, Effective Environment, Work Place Esteem, Learning.},
        month = {January},
        }