A Comparative Study on the Effectiveness of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol versus Conventional Management in Patients Undergoing Gynecological Surgeries

  • Unique Paper ID: 185122
  • PageNo: 522-523
  • Abstract:
  • Background: Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocols are evidence-based perioperative care pathways that reduce surgical stress and improve recovery. Limited evidence exists in gynecology. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of ERAS versus conventional perioperative management among patients undergoing gynecological surgeries. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted at Nalanda Medical College & Hospital, Patna, including 100 women divided into ERAS (n=50) and conventional (n=50) groups. Outcomes included hospital stay, postoperative pain, patient satisfaction, and recovery parameters. Results: ERAS significantly reduced hospital stay (3.94 vs. 5.10 days, p < 0.001), pain scores (3.00 vs. 3.60, p = 0.001), and improved satisfaction (7.12 vs. 6.36, p < 0.001). Mobilization and oral intake showed no significant differences but favored ERAS. No increase in complications was observed. Conclusion: ERAS enhances recovery, shortens hospital stay, and improves satisfaction in gynecological surgeries without added risk.

Copyright & License

Copyright © 2026 Authors retain the copyright of this article. This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

BibTeX

@article{185122,
        author = {Dr. Harshanayana and Prof. Dr. Tabassum Ahmed},
        title = {A Comparative Study on the Effectiveness of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol versus Conventional Management in Patients Undergoing Gynecological Surgeries},
        journal = {International Journal of Innovative Research in Technology},
        year = {2025},
        volume = {12},
        number = {5},
        pages = {522-523},
        issn = {2349-6002},
        url = {https://ijirt.org/article?manuscript=185122},
        abstract = {Background: Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocols are evidence-based perioperative care pathways that reduce surgical stress and improve recovery. Limited evidence exists in gynecology. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of ERAS versus conventional perioperative management among patients undergoing gynecological surgeries. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted at Nalanda Medical College & Hospital, Patna, including 100 women divided into ERAS (n=50) and conventional (n=50) groups. Outcomes included hospital stay, postoperative pain, patient satisfaction, and recovery parameters. Results: ERAS significantly reduced hospital stay (3.94 vs. 5.10 days, p < 0.001), pain scores (3.00 vs. 3.60, p = 0.001), and improved satisfaction (7.12 vs. 6.36, p < 0.001). Mobilization and oral intake showed no significant differences but favored ERAS. No increase in complications was observed. Conclusion: ERAS enhances recovery, shortens hospital stay, and improves satisfaction in gynecological surgeries without added risk.},
        keywords = {ERAS, gynecological surgery, postoperative recovery, hospital stay, patient satisfaction.},
        month = {October},
        }

Cite This Article

Harshanayana, D., & Ahmed, P. D. T. (2025). A Comparative Study on the Effectiveness of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol versus Conventional Management in Patients Undergoing Gynecological Surgeries. International Journal of Innovative Research in Technology (IJIRT), 12(5), 522–523.

Related Articles