Copyright © 2026 Authors retain the copyright of this article. This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

@article{178429,
        author = {ALEENA HENRY},
        title = {THE FINE LINE OF SEPARATION: CONFLICT BETWEEN JUDICIARY AND LEGISLATURE},
        journal = {International Journal of Innovative Research in Technology},
        year = {2025},
        volume = {11},
        number = {12},
        pages = {4772-4780},
        issn = {2349-6002},
        url = {https://ijirt.org/article?manuscript=178429},
        abstract = {In any constitutional democracy, the doctrine of separation of powers is a foundational principle aimed at ensuring that the legislature, executive, and judiciary operate independently yet harmoniously. However, the practical application of this doctrine often leads to friction, particularly between the legislature and the judiciary. While the legislature is entrusted with law-making, the judiciary interprets and, at times, reviews the validity of these laws. In India, this dynamic has led to a series of confrontations, especially in cases involving constitutional amendments, judicial appointments, and legislative privileges. This assignment seeks to analyze the root causes, legal implications, and evolving nature of the judiciary-legislature conflict, drawing from landmark cases and constitutional provisions. It also examines whether such conflicts threaten democratic balance or reinforce institutional accountability.},
        keywords = {Separation of powers, Judiciary, Legislature, Constitution, Conflict},
        month = {May},
        }