Copyright © 2026 Authors retain the copyright of this article. This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

@article{186162,
        author = {R.V.Mrudula and Dr.Akash},
        title = {SHORT IMPLANTS: AN ALTERNATIVE TO CONVENTIONAL IMPLANTS},
        journal = {International Journal of Innovative Research in Technology},
        year = {2025},
        volume = {12},
        number = {6},
        pages = {648-651},
        issn = {2349-6002},
        url = {https://ijirt.org/article?manuscript=186162},
        abstract = {Dental implants have become quite successful, prompting more research aimed at making surgeries easier and boosting how well implants hold up over time. Thanks to technological advancements, we're now seeing more implants being used even in complicated cases. But there's a challenge—after a tooth is extracted, the loss of bone often complicates the placement of implants. In these situations, traditional implants might not work, which is where short implants come into play as a viable alternative.
Short implants are designed specifically for use in areas of the jaw that have lost a lot of bone. They can be an effective treatment option for patients with resorbed ridges. By relying on shorter fixtures, dentists can often avoid the need for complex bone grafting procedures. This not only makes surgery simpler but also shortens the overall treatment time, leading to better comfort and quicker recovery for patients.
This review is set to look into whether short dental implants can act as a reliable substitute for longer implants in cases where there's limited bone volume. We’ll also examine how well they perform biomechanically},
        keywords = {},
        month = {November},
        }