Copyright © 2026 Authors retain the copyright of this article. This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

@article{189599,
        author = {Mahadev Asaram Jadhav and Devkirani Pandharinath Pawar and Yogini Amit Ranade},
        title = {ETHICAL ISSUES IN DNA PROFILING AND DATABASE MAINTENANCE: A FORENSIC JUSTICE PERSPECTIVE},
        journal = {International Journal of Innovative Research in Technology},
        year = {2025},
        volume = {12},
        number = {7},
        pages = {6469-6474},
        issn = {2349-6002},
        url = {https://ijirt.org/article?manuscript=189599},
        abstract = {DNA profiling has emerged as a critical tool in forensic science, widely used in criminal investigations to identify perpetrators, eliminate suspects, and exonerate the wrongfully accused. However, the growing reliance on genetic information raises a host of ethical concerns that challenge the boundaries between public safety and individual rights. This review paper critically examines these concerns from a forensic justice perspective, focusing on the ethical implications of DNA profiling and the long-term maintenance of forensic DNA databases. Key issues include the erosion of personal privacy, particularly due to the sensitive nature of genetic information contained within DNA profiles. The absence of informed consent in many forensic contexts further complicates ethical compliance, especially where DNA samples are repurposed for unrelated investigations. Indefinite data retention practices, including those involving individuals who have not been convicted, violate principles of autonomy and the presumption of innocence. Additionally, the use of familial DNA searching has proven effective in solving crimes but has simultaneously introduced the risk of genetic surveillance of innocent individuals. This review also addresses misidentification risks arising from human or technical errors in forensic processes. Moreover, the overrepresentation of marginalized racial and socioeconomic groups in national DNA databases reflects and perpetuates existing systemic inequalities within the criminal justice system. This review paper advocates for robust legal and ethical frameworks to regulate DNA profiling practices. Recommendations include transparent consent protocols, proportional data retention policies, independent oversight bodies, and measures to mitigate bias. This study concludes that while DNA technology provides significant benefits in forensic science, ethical safeguards must be prioritized to ensure that its application aligns with human rights, privacy and justice.},
        keywords = {DNA profiling, forensic ethics, informed privacy, racial bias, forensic justice, genetic surveillance, database retention},
        month = {December},
        }