Copyright © 2026 Authors retain the copyright of this article. This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

@article{193844,
        author = {Sameena Ameer and Dr Anupriya Yadav},
        title = {TRADEMARK PROTECTION IN THE METAVERSE AND VIRTUAL WORLDS UNDER INDIAN LAW},
        journal = {International Journal of Innovative Research in Technology},
        year = {2026},
        volume = {12},
        number = {10},
        pages = {1901-1913},
        issn = {2349-6002},
        url = {https://ijirt.org/article?manuscript=193844},
        abstract = {The rapid growth of “metaverse” has transformed how brands create goodwill, market products, and interact with consumers. Alongside legitimate brand expansion into virtual worlds, however, new forms of trademark misuse have emerged like the avatar-level impersonation, virtual counterfeiting, unauthorised NFTs and digital collectibles, misleading brand experiences. This shift challenges traditional trademark doctrines rooted in territoriality, “use in the course of trade,” consumer confusion, and enforceability against anonymous or platform-mediated infringement. The metaverse platform is vulnerable to infringement through marketplaces embedded in virtual environments leading to global legal evolution. While Indian courts have not yet developed a comprehensive body of “metaverse trademark” jurisprudence, India’s trademark framework is largely technology-neutral and capable of responding to digital infringement through established principles of infringement, passing off, dilution, jurisdiction, and intermediary liability.
This paper critically examines how Indian trademark protection can apply to metaverse disputes, focusing on: (i) whether trademark “use” covers virtual goods, NFTs, and immersive advertising; (ii) classification challenges under the Nice system and Indian practice; (iii) jurisdiction and enforcement in borderless environments; and (iv) platform responsibility and remedies such as dynamic injunctions. It also examines how the Trade Marks Act 1999 can be applied to virtual goods and metaverse-based commerce. It evaluates enforcement and jurisdiction challenges for Indian right-holders, including evidence preservation, identification of anonymous infringers, and cross-border harms. Moreover, it analyses platform liability and safe-harbour. The paper concludes with targeted legal and policy recommendations for clarification on classification and “use,” procedural tools such as dynamic injunctions, stronger notice-and-action frameworks for virtual marketplaces, and specialised capacity-building for enforcement agencies to ensure Indian trademark law remains commercially realistic and are rights-protective in the digital economy.},
        keywords = {Metaverse Trademarks, Virtual Infringement, Trade Marks Act 1999, NFT Protection, Digital Goods Registry},
        month = {March},
        }