Seismic Performance Evaluation of G+15 Soft Storey RC Buildings: A Comparative Study of Confined Masonry Infill Walls and RC Shear Walls Using Nonlinear Time History Analysis

  • Unique Paper ID: 205935
  • Volume: 13
  • Issue: 1
  • PageNo: 9052-9062
  • Abstract:
  • Soft storey buildings with open ground floors represent one of the most seismically hazardous structural configurations in Indian urban areas. This study presents a comprehensive seismic performance evaluation of a G+15 reinforced concrete moment-resisting frame building with confined masonry infill walls in Storeys 1–15 and an open ground storey, located in Seismic Zone V per IS 1893 (Part 1): 2016 on Type II medium soil. Three-dimensional finite element models are developed in ETABS v21, and Nonlinear Time History Analysis (NLTHA) is performed using five PEER NGA-West2 ground motion records scaled to the IS 1893 design spectrum. Two configurations are compared: Model A (confined masonry infill, soft storey) and Model B (perimeter RC shear walls with confined openings). Model A exhibits ground storey drift ratios of 0.6747% exceeding the IS 1893 limit of 0.4% by 68.7%. Model B reduces peak roof displacement by 36.2% and ground storey drift by 97.5%, achieving full IS 1893 compliance across all storeys with a 110% increase in base shear. The study conclusively demonstrates that RC shear walls with properly confined openings are an effective retrofitting strategy eliminating all drift violations.

Copyright & License

Copyright © 2026 Authors retain the copyright of this article. This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

BibTeX

@article{205935,
        author = {Shaik Abdullah and Md Imtiyaz Qureshi},
        title = {Seismic Performance Evaluation of G+15 Soft Storey RC Buildings: A Comparative Study of Confined Masonry Infill Walls and RC Shear Walls Using Nonlinear Time History Analysis},
        journal = {International Journal of Innovative Research in Technology},
        year = {2026},
        volume = {13},
        number = {1},
        pages = {9052-9062},
        issn = {2349-6002},
        url = {https://ijirt.org/article?manuscript=205935},
        abstract = {Soft storey buildings with open ground floors represent one of the most seismically hazardous structural configurations in Indian urban areas. This study presents a comprehensive seismic performance evaluation of a G+15 reinforced concrete moment-resisting frame building with confined masonry infill walls in Storeys 1–15 and an open ground storey, located in Seismic Zone V per IS 1893 (Part 1): 2016 on Type II medium soil. Three-dimensional finite element models are developed in ETABS v21, and Nonlinear Time History Analysis (NLTHA) is performed using five PEER NGA-West2 ground motion records scaled to the IS 1893 design spectrum. Two configurations are compared: Model A (confined masonry infill, soft storey) and Model B (perimeter RC shear walls with confined openings). Model A exhibits ground storey drift ratios of 0.6747% exceeding the IS 1893 limit of 0.4% by 68.7%. Model B reduces peak roof displacement by 36.2% and ground storey drift by 97.5%, achieving full IS 1893 compliance across all storeys with a 110% increase in base shear. The study conclusively demonstrates that RC shear walls with properly confined openings are an effective retrofitting strategy eliminating all drift violations.},
        keywords = {Confined masonry infill, ETABS, G+15 RC building, inter-storey drift, IS 1893, NGA-West2, nonlinear time history analysis, RC shear walls, seismic performance, soft storey.},
        month = {June},
        }

Cite This Article

Abdullah, S., & Qureshi, M. I. (2026). Seismic Performance Evaluation of G+15 Soft Storey RC Buildings: A Comparative Study of Confined Masonry Infill Walls and RC Shear Walls Using Nonlinear Time History Analysis. International Journal of Innovative Research in Technology (IJIRT), 13(1), 9052–9062.

Related Articles