Copyright © 2026 Authors retain the copyright of this article. This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

@article{188454,
        author = {Sarika Tyagi and Dr. Anil Kumar Sirohi},
        title = {Echoes and Inventions},
        journal = {International Journal of Innovative Research in Technology},
        year = {2025},
        volume = {12},
        number = {7},
        pages = {2217-2235},
        issn = {2349-6002},
        url = {https://ijirt.org/article?manuscript=188454},
        abstract = {This paper examines the thematic and visual transformations that occur when literary works are adapted into film, television, and digital media. Moving beyond fidelity-based critiques, the study approaches adaptation as a creative and interpretive process shaped by the demands of different mediums, the cultural contexts of production, and the artistic choices of adapters. Drawing on the theoretical frameworks of Linda Hutcheon, Robert Stam, and Brian McFarlane, it argues that adaptations function as dynamic dialogues between texts, reconfiguring narrative meaning through shifts in theme, structure, and visual expression. Through comparative case studies—including Frankenstein, The Great Gatsby, Never Let Me Go, Little Women, and The Handmaid’s Tale—the paper analyzes how internal literary themes such as identity, memory, power, and resistance are externalized and reshaped through cinematic devices like mise-en-scène, cinematography, editing, and color symbolism. The study further investigates how socio-cultural and historical contexts influence adaptation, demonstrating how contemporary adaptations often reinterpret source texts through feminist, political, or ideological lenses. By exploring these thematic and aesthetic shifts across film, television, and digital platforms, the paper positions adaptation as a meaningful act of reimagination that extends the life of literary works while engaging new audiences. Ultimately, it contends that adaptation is not a derivative reproduction but a creative form of storytelling that reveals how narratives evolve across time, medium, and culture.},
        keywords = {Adaptation theory; literary adaptation; thematic shifts; visual aesthetics; intertextuality; narratology; film adaptation; television adaptation; cultural context; feminist reinterpretation; mise-en-scène; cinematography; narrative transformation; medium specificity; reimagination.},
        month = {December},
        }