A Review on Comparative Study on Seismic Behaviour of RC Structure with diagrid and X- steel bracing for Different Stories

  • Unique Paper ID: 161243
  • Volume: 10
  • Issue: 3
  • PageNo: 54-57
  • Abstract:
  • The seismic behavior of reinforced concrete (RC) structures with diagrid structures and x-bracing structures for various stories is compared in this work. This study uses the structural ETABS software to assess how well these structural systems perform when subjected to seismic and wind loads. These findings have the conclusion that the diagrid construction might be a good substitute for tall structures in seismic areas. The primary findings and suggestions of this study are that the diagrid structure should be designed with sufficient stiffness and strength to prevent excessive deformation and failure, and that additional research is required to examine the effects of various factors, including soil-structure interaction, material properties, and loading patterns on the seismic behavior of these structures. Buildings with varied stories (36-story, 40-story, 50-story, and 60-story) and an area of 1296m2 (36m x 36m) were used for the analysis. The evaluation of both lateral load resisting systems' story displacements. structural analysis utilizing the Response Spectrum Method. The findings demonstrate that, in terms of displacement, drift ratio, base shear, and structural ductility, the diagrid construction outperforms the x-bracing structure in terms of seismic resistance.

Copyright & License

Copyright © 2025 Authors retain the copyright of this article. This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

BibTeX

@article{161243,
        author = {Pushkaraj. S. Mane and Pramod. B. Salgar},
        title = {A Review on Comparative Study on Seismic Behaviour of RC Structure with diagrid and X-  steel bracing for Different Stories},
        journal = {International Journal of Innovative Research in Technology},
        year = {},
        volume = {10},
        number = {3},
        pages = {54-57},
        issn = {2349-6002},
        url = {https://ijirt.org/article?manuscript=161243},
        abstract = {The seismic behavior of reinforced concrete (RC) structures with diagrid structures and x-bracing structures for various stories is compared in this work. This study uses the structural ETABS software to assess how well these structural systems perform when subjected to seismic and wind loads. These findings have the conclusion that the diagrid construction might be a good substitute for tall structures in seismic areas. The primary findings and suggestions of this study are that the diagrid structure should be designed with sufficient stiffness and strength to prevent excessive deformation and failure, and that additional research is required to examine the effects of various factors, including soil-structure interaction, material properties, and loading patterns on the seismic behavior of these structures. Buildings with varied stories (36-story, 40-story, 50-story, and 60-story) and an area of 1296m2 (36m x 36m) were used for the analysis. The evaluation of both lateral load resisting systems' story displacements. structural analysis utilizing the Response Spectrum Method. The findings demonstrate that, in terms of displacement, drift ratio, base shear, and structural ductility, the diagrid construction outperforms the x-bracing structure in terms of seismic resistance.},
        keywords = {seismic response spectrum, diagrid structure, X-steel bracing structure, lateral load resistance, and ETAB.},
        month = {},
        }

Related Articles